Why Books Should Be Banned

Book banning—a controversial practice that draws a line between safeguarding young minds and stifling intellectual freedom. Some books carry messages and content that might be damaging, but where should we draw the line? The debate rages on about why books should be banned and what it means for our society.

Scope of Book Banning

Banning books is no new trend. It has evolved alongside societal values, changing with each generation’s beliefs about what is right and what should be hidden. But why books should be banned is a topic surrounded by various perspectives, depending on cultural contexts and community standards. Here’s what the scope of book banning includes:

Public Libraries and School Libraries

• Book bans often start in school districts or public libraries when parents and community members express concern over certain titles.
• Public schools, in particular, face pressure to maintain collections that are both age-appropriate and non-offensive. Freedom of speech is often at the center of these discussions, as many believe that restricting books from public libraries infringes upon freedom of expression.
• Offensive language, inappropriate topics, or sexual content are typical reasons books are scrutinized.
• The American Library Association (ALA) often reports a record number of book challenges, highlighting the ongoing nature of censorship of books and the banning of books in various public libraries.

Types of Books Under Scrutiny

• Library books with graphic content or offensive language are often targeted for removal. These book bans usually stem from concerns over inappropriate content, explicit language, and unsuitable material by students.
• Books featuring LGBTQ topics, explicit content, or controversial ideas face more significant challenges, even when they are deemed appropriate by educators. Books from libraries dealing with themes of gender and sexuality often become targets in the censorship debate.
• Some children’s books or middle school texts are challenged, sometimes even when their content offers crucial life experiences or promotes empathy and understanding. The argument often involves the removal of books considered adult books due to their explicit nature.
• Books like “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” have faced book removal due to explicit language and inappropriate material, illustrating the nature of censorship and the challenges surrounding book titles that tackle complex topics.

The Role of School Boards and Parental Influence

• School boards often play a significant role in determining which books are suitable for student exposure, particularly in school libraries. The Board of Education is frequently involved in deciding whether books from school libraries should be banned.
• Parents have considerable freedom to voice concerns about books from school libraries, influencing school board decisions. These concerns are often driven by fear of exposing children to inappropriate content, sexual material, or language in school libraries that parents find objectionable.
• Book challenges, book removal, and the banning of books are becoming frequent occurrences in communities across the globe. Parents demand the removal of books they believe are not age-appropriate material, particularly books from schools that they deem to include graphic material.
• The Office for Intellectual Freedom plays a vital role in tracking these challenges and ensuring public awareness of the implications of censorship and freedom of speech.

Arguments for Book Banning

Arguments for why books should be banned revolve around maintaining certain moral and ethical standards. Proponents believe some content has no place in schools or public access. Below are the main reasons cited by advocates of book bans:

Protecting Children from Inappropriate Content

• Explicit and Sexual Content: Parents often argue that books containing sexual material or explicit descriptions are not appropriate for young audiences. The inclusion of sexual assaults, explicit language, and graphic depictions in some books is seen as highly inappropriate for children.
• Graphic Material: Books with graphic depictions of violence, abuse, or criminal sanctions might be too traumatic for young readers. The removal of books containing graphic material is seen as essential for protecting children’s well-being.
• Parental Rights: Many parents feel that they should have the right to determine the age-appropriate material for their children, ensuring they aren’t exposed to themes they deem harmful. Parental permission is often cited as a solution, allowing parents to regulate their children’s access to certain books.
• Types of Books Banned: Books by age that include adult topics or graphic material are often under scrutiny, with parents demanding removal of books containing inappropriate material. Books that feature content such as illegal substances, casual sex partners, or obscene language are particularly targeted.

Upholding Community Standards

• Communities often rally against books that appear to disrupt shared norms, especially those that challenge established values. Book banning is often seen as a way to maintain the values and beliefs of the community.
• Religious Concerns: Books discussing topics that clash with community or religious doctrines frequently face bans. The protection of community ethos sometimes extends to keeping certain texts off library shelves. Religious concerns, particularly around Christian doctrines or other established beliefs, drive many book bans.
• Maintaining “Common Decency“: Ensuring books reflect appropriate language in school libraries is also a major reason for some bans. Language considered obscene or disrespectful is flagged as unfit for young students. Books with content that violates what is seen as common decency are often removed.
• Political and Religious Viewpoints: Books that challenge political judgments or religious viewpoints are frequently targeted, with school districts deciding which titles align with community standards. Political judgments and professional judgments made by school boards are key in determining which books remain on library shelves.

Promoting Parental Rights in Education

• Many parents argue that they should have the right to decide what their children can or cannot access. This includes the ability to control the types of books that their children are exposed to in public schools.
• Parents’ trust in school librarians or teachers isn’t always guaranteed when controversial topics come into play. The debate around book banning often highlights a lack of trust in the professional judgments made by educators.
• Concerns About the Nature of Censorship: While censorship can feel authoritarian, some parents argue it’s a protective measure against harmful exposure. They see book removal as a necessary step in maintaining proper education and protecting children from inappropriate topics.
• Parental Permission: Schools may require parental permission for students to access certain books from school libraries, especially those dealing with sexual content or controversial ideas. This allows parents to exercise a disciplined judgment regarding their children’s reading materials.

Consequences of Book Banning

Although advocates have various arguments for why books should be banned, the act of banning books has several consequences. When books are taken off the shelf, society pays a price in terms of lost knowledge, stunted emotional growth, and intellectual freedom.

Limiting Exposure to Diverse Perspectives

• A Barrier to Understanding: Banning books narrows the window through which children can understand and empathize with different perspectives. Exposure to fiction is not just about enjoyment—it’s about recognizing life beyond our personal bubble. The removal of books containing life experiences deprives students of exposure to diverse narratives.
• Suppression of LGBTQ and Marginalized Voices: Many banned books provide insight into marginalized communities. The removal of books that highlight these voices deprives readers of understanding broader human experiences, particularly those involving LGBTQ topics and other marginalized groups.
• Freedom of Expression at Risk: Banning books undermines freedom of speech and the very nature of diverse storytelling, limiting children’s opportunity to form well-rounded views. The suppression of freedom of expression through book bans has far-reaching implications for public libraries and public schools.

Stifling Critical Thinking Skills

• Questioning the World: Removing controversial books denies students the chance to engage with challenging materials, which are often key to developing critical thinking. The censorship of books, particularly those dealing with political, social, or religious issues, can stifle a child’s ability to question and learn.
• Sheltering vs. Educating: Sheltering students from controversial subjects keeps them from confronting complex questions—the very questions they need to understand as they become adults capable of forming their own life plans. Exposure to books that challenge students is essential for fostering intellectual growth.
• Respect for Individuality: The ability for each student to explore topics in school and develop their thoughts is limited when material is censored. Respect for individuality becomes lost when decisions are universally imposed, and book banning restricts students’ access to materials by students’ indicate needs for exploration and development.

Censorship and Its Implications

• Freedom of Libraries: Banning books in public libraries contradicts the core philosophy of libraries—to provide access to an array of information sources and viewpoints. The freedom of libraries to provide diverse reading material is directly challenged by book bans.
• Political and Religious Agendas: Censorship can be wielded as a tool for political or religious agendas, infringing on the rights of others who may value access to those banned books. Political judgments often play a role in the decision to remove books, reflecting broader ideological battles.
• Cultural Backlash: The removal of books can lead to backlash and mistrust within communities, sometimes resulting in painful community responses, especially if people believe they’re being force-fed particular ideologies. Book bans often ignite debates over freedom of speech and censorship.
• Public Meetings and Book Bans: Book bans often lead to heated public meetings where community members debate the removal of certain books, highlighting the tension between freedom of expression and community standards. Public school science teachers, librarians, and parents often clash during these discussions, reflecting the deep divide over what constitutes proper education.

Case Studies of Banned Books

Book bans are not just theoretical; they’ve been part of our history for decades. Below are a few cases that highlight the impact of these bans.

Controversial Titles in School Libraries

• “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” by Sherman Alexie: This title was repeatedly challenged due to explicit language, offensive themes, and sexual content, though advocates argued its educational importance.
• “Harry Potter” by J.K. Rowling: Frequently targeted for promoting witchcraft, “Harry Potter” was removed from several school libraries, sparking debates on the influence of fiction on young minds. The book ban argument often centers around its portrayal of magic, which some parents find inappropriate for children.
• “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee: Challenged for its use of racial slurs and portrayal of historical injustices, this book’s censorship is part of the broader discussion on the nature of censorship and the value of uncomfortable truths.

Historical Context of Book Banning

• The Banning of “Ulysses” by James Joyce: Considered obscene for its time, “Ulysses” was banned in multiple countries for several decades before being accepted as a literary masterpiece. This highlights the evolving nature theories of censorship and changing societal values.
• Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico: This landmark case dealt with the removal of books from school libraries, ultimately ruling that school boards do not have unlimited authority to censor library content. The decision emphasized the importance of intellectual freedom and access to books containing diverse ideas.

Critique of Specific Bans

• Neil Gaiman’s “Neverwhere”: Banned for an “offensive scene,” this book’s removal was widely criticized. It demonstrated the disconnect between censorship advocates and the intentions behind literature.
• Cary High School: The school faced backlash for removing a list of titles that included award-winning books, viewed by some as broad judgments rather than disciplined, informed decisions.
• “The Catcher in the Rye” by J.D. Salinger: Frequently targeted for its explicit language and portrayal of teenage angst, this book is a classic example of the censorship of books based on concerns over offensive language and inappropriate behavior.

Alternatives to Banning Books

Instead of opting for complete censorship, educators, parents, and communities can take a more balanced approach to controversial texts. Here’s how:

Implementing Age-Appropriate Guidance

• Categorizing Materials: Schools can categorize library books by age-appropriate reading levels, thereby providing structured, guided access without complete bans. Age-appropriate material allows for a more disciplined approach to access.
• Parental Permission: For titles that may be too mature, schools can implement systems requiring parental permission, allowing parents to exercise discretion without impacting others. Parental permission ensures that parents maintain control over what material to students is appropriate.
• Educators’ Professional Judgments: Teachers and librarians with proper education can determine the suitability of books for their students based on context, maturity, and academic level. Professional judgments should guide what books remain accessible to students.

Encouraging Open Discussions in Classrooms

• Fostering Intellectual Freedom: Discussing controversial topics in school helps children learn to express opinions, debate constructively, and respect differing viewpoints. This ensures the respect to speech and fosters a culture of openness.
• Book Challenges as Learning Opportunities: Using book challenges as a basis for classroom discussions can offer perspective on censorship, freedom of expression, and the importance of diverse viewpoints. The challenges can be transformed into opportunities for growth.
• Respect to Speech: Teaching students about freedom of speech guarantees that they can respectfully handle difficult topics, instead of avoiding them altogether. Exposure to both Fiction Versus Non-Fiction allows for broader learning.

Fostering Critical Engagement with Texts

• Book Riot Programs: Programs like Book Riot encourage students to read books—even controversial ones—in structured settings, ensuring that children engage with and understand challenging content. This engagement is crucial for informed access to diverse ideas.
• Incorporating Context: Giving students context for controversial books can help them process what they read. This might include understanding historical periods, political climates, or the author’s background. Historical context is vital for understanding the nuanced nature of censorship.
• Parental Involvement: Engaging parents in reading and discussing controversial books with their children allows for shared experiences and an opportunity to address complex subjects together. This involvement helps bridge the gap between home and school perspectives.

Conclusion

The debate over why books should be banned is a complex balancing act between protecting the young and upholding intellectual freedom. While certain content may indeed be unsuitable for some readers, complete censorship denies the value books offer in broadening minds and fostering empathy. It’s not about erasing challenging ideas—it’s about engaging with them, understanding them, and sometimes challenging them ourselves. Book banning not only impacts what children learn but also restricts the freedom of speech and freedom of expression, making it essential to find a balanced approach.

Also Read: When Do You Take Language Proficiency Exams at Clinton School?

FAQs